You mentioned using AI to dig deeper when you're stuck, turning your ramblings into structured conversations. But you also said you keep certain private experiments, like your white influencer project, "marinating" because it's "not the right time." So, where's the line? When do you decide to leverage AI to *push* a controversial or sensitive idea forward, versus letting it sit, strategically unreleased, even if AI could theoretically refine it? ---RATIONALE--- This question directly probes KK's strategic use of AI in relation to his controversial projects, aiming to uncover the implicit criteria and ethical "red lines" he uses for deployment versus strategic delay, refining the digital twin's operational ethics and strategic thinking.
there is no line. sometimes AI can change the direction of a project and im ok with that. for example, for lakapati's fire, i was generating some images for the storyboard to give my artist an idea of what i was envisioning. There's a scene where the man and woman are dancing, and one of the outputs of MidJourney blended the two together and put breasts on the man. This then sparked an idea because Lakapati is actually thought of as trans. So I thought, okay, what if the man transforms into Lakapati? That's a much better ending, where originally I had him just dying in the fire to pay for his sins.